-
I'm always skeptical of branded "CSS methodologies". I don't like code cults, or personality cults, or "right" ways of doing CSS… But: ✅I borrow ideas from them ✅Sharing techniques is good ✅More options ~> fewer big cults? Should I stop fretting & name the OddBird approach?On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 51 Favorites Mood -1 🙁
-
I am mostly interested in helping us communally define a CSS "paradigm" – a Cascading alternative to purely Object Oriented or Functional thinking. I'm not the only one doing that work, by a long shot. But it's more interesting to me than any single naming convention.Permalink On twitter.com
-
More difficult… *All Of Them* lean heavily on OOCSS, often with little credit. And most of them are by cis white men, who release branded books & courses, getting *All The Credit* from ideas developed in the open. Maybe it's a business model to borrow from, but also 🙁Permalink On twitter.com
-
That's strange, there seems to be less interest in this point… 😬😂Permalink On twitter.com